What is the difference between Dutch/French style muay thai & the muay thai practised in Thailand? - what is the difference between dutch muay thai and thailand muay thai
Recently I read an article that mentioned that the Dutch Muay Thai MMA is better suited to the traditional Muay Thai. I know there is a difference between Dutch Muay Thai and kickboxing, but the article refers specifically to "Dutch style Muay Thai. Can someone clarify this and perhaps tell me what are the technical differences between the two species?
Monday, January 25, 2010
What Is The Difference Between Dutch Muay Thai And Thailand Muay Thai What Is The Difference Between Dutch/French Style Muay Thai & The Muay Thai Practised In Thailand?
4 comments:
It should not matter whether it can be better THAI.how Muay Thai Muay Thai Muay Thai is better or worse, if s is not Muay
A professional MMA might not want to put so often in fear of a retreat, but theres no difference, perhaps, but a greater emphasis on the striking hand. I am sure we have all of the Dutch kickboxer in Thailand have been trained. Another example is the Jiu Jitsu and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, no difference. Both species were from the original, and the child can not be greater than the mother claimed, perhaps only more developed. New movements can be added, but as far as art and philosophy, both exactly the same. I know that fighters are fighting the Western emphasis on strength training and conditioning, but only a few times a year, but there they fight like every month. The boys are like over 100 fight in her career.
Never heard of Muay Thai French, Dutch, but Muay Thai is still very common in many countries.
The DMT is different (Dutch Muay Thai) to focus more on boxing and leg kicks. They also tend to avoid the kick and not blocked. If I'm right, focusing more) on the international standard (Muay Thai, no elbows. It applies to many Westerners, because traditional Muay Thai requires that you well equipped to be able to block kicks repeatly. Muay Thai also more time for most people learn in the West, because they focus on both kicks and knees. Thailan at the knees and feet, to score more points, while rarely unless earnings obiviously really hurt your opponent, or knock-out.
It's actually very difficult to distinguish between the different between the two, since they are very similar. So very different is the only stragery.
To see more examples, here are some examples of the Dutch Muay Thai:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOjkVRPz4 ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBIfgtk9m ...
Ramon Dekker; Dut fatherU.S. Muay Thai: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b56oTsT2p ...
It is a very strange assertion that the article did not. I of course, I do not know why I would say that if we insist that Westerners are trying to perform best in boxing and kicking, while the Thais working in your account with the rivet. However, MMA is still wouldnt obvious meaning, which almost always ends in the ground, where would be of course a good knowledge of the Clinch be useful. It is also more likely to experience Muay Thai Boran, was the old style of Muay Thai and ground combat. This would benefit them the "consultation fee" of the West, as many Westerners know it, Muay Boran.
To do for this magazine, this statement is obsurb. Watch Buakaw. He is a champion of boxing and K1 impressive. I have heard many complaints about certain types of Muay Thai is better than another. However, the fact that the art is created is the Muay Thai. The only difference is how you use it and not the country where you are. His place in the individual and his teacher.
Post a Comment